Searching Compression Signatures: (3347 built-in, 0 user(*) )ĮXIF.Make / Software EXIF.Model Quality Subsamp Match? Signature (Rotated): 014C6C24A9EE0C6BDCC1598CEECCE808ĮXIF Software: OK I downloaded both images directly from GettyImages (there are some high resolution free versions for editorial use available). The color image referenced by the original poster was taken with a NIKON.īOTH of the images have EXIF data indicating they were taken 'T22:56:06'. It is a B&W image, taken with a SONY camera (per the EXIF data). I have a followup question I hope you can help me with: There was a second photo released from the 'Christening Photoshoot' on July 6, 2019. I found this thread while looking into the same EXIF DateTimeOriginal anomaly as the original poster. There's no way to know from the image alone. Metadata can be changed, by accident from a faulty processing workflow or on purpose. I have no idea why they would be different now, nor can I comment on what the actual date the photo was taken. When the camera created the file, both time stamps would have been the same. This is all Greek to me, so I'm trying to learn and understand. Attached is a screenshot of the EXIF data plus I pasted the info below. I'm guessing he used the same disk for both photo shoots. The May 8th shoot was of only a few of the same subjects so the photo is different then the July 6th group photo.Īre the two dates referring to the same photo I got the info from, ( the group photo supposedly taken on July 6th?) Or is it possible the ORIGINAL date refers to the first time the photographer used the same disk in the camera. This info was taken from a photo supposedly taken on July 6th.(matching the CREATE DATE) It was the 2nd photo shoot with the same client with the first photo shoot on May 8th (matching the ORIGINAL DATE). I think I need your help understanding the difference between the DATE/TIME ORIGINAL AND CREATE DATE.

Exiftool createdate datetimeoriginal